CoreStory Frontier

CoreStory Frontier / public research

Evidence before confidence.

Frontier publishes the result, the null result, the limitation, and the artifact behind each claim. Two studies are open now.

Research ledger

Claim status is part of the result.

SupportedAgent orchestration

PATOIS

A response-scoped guidance channel was read and acted on when it carried otherwise unavailable state.

Boundary: one model, synthetic tool surfaces. Guidance improving orchestration quality remains untested; typed guidance was not superior in the measured probes.

Supported

Response-scoped guidance is legible.

Unsupported

Typed guidance beats prose guidance.

Untested

Guidance improves continuation quality.

SupportedEvaluation integrity

The plausibility floor

A blind agent with no code access scored 22.6–32.9 / 100 on a code-comprehension rubric.

022.6–32.9 blind floor100

Boundary: two public COBOL corpora, one answering-model family, two judge families. Identifier renaming isolates repository-specific recall, not general domain knowledge.

Supported

The blind floor is far above zero.

Supported

The familiar-corpus premium is mostly identifier recall.

Limitation

The floor's own run-to-run variance is unmeasured.

The publication floor

A Frontier study must make its basis inspectable before its conclusion is promoted.

  1. ProvenanceThe source, revision, model, and instrument are named.
  2. Degenerate controlThe study asks what should score zero—not only what might score 100.
  3. UncertaintyNoise, exclusions, judge spread, and unresolved effects stay visible.
  4. FalsifiabilityPredictions and what would change the conclusion are stated.
  5. ArtifactsMethod and publishable data remain one action away.